The letter which I reproduce below, Jesus Garcia Castrillo, http://www.elbaco.com/ writer, was sent to Luis Herrero. Refers to "the case Cela." In it the author, with an unquestionable wisdom and serenity tiresome, not to mention a remarkable literary quality, he defends truth, Carmen Formoso, in addition to tenérselas to do with the court for justice it deserves has to pass the ordeal in a station, the COPE, which kept its editorial evangelical maxim: the truth shall make you free. At the time the letter was returned and therefore not had no response.
In defense of truth and freedom
CASTRILLO GARCIA JESUS \u200b\u200bWROTE:
Luis Amigo (Herrera):
This morning I heard your conversation with Carmen Formoso Lapido.Todos those of your new gathering you were doing with regard to deception and fraud which is a part of the current literature. You, from your station, trying to convince listeners that Carmen has made a false accusation. I guess you know that the Planeta Prize is a sham and a fraud, although it could be you did not know you never had the chance to prove it.
there with you, I thought I heard Fernando Sanchez spoke to a synopsis of the two books to see where he had plagiarized. With what Camilo and Metro will continue to be very grateful to you, but if you know the same as FS Dragó you like him.
Drago knows I'll tell you exactly what is the Metro because it has been by my side, at least at dinner at the Hotel Princesa Sofia in Barcelona on October 15, 1993. And he saw and heard what I did. It could also be that although he is very intelligent and observant, not been realized, and I was more naive, by chance if I had not noticed.
synopsis can not do because the plagiarism has been very particular. It was much more than a plagiarism unprecedented any kind. It was a monumental evil thing. I'll explain with a comparison to see if you understand me better than you interviewed Carmen Formoso Lapido. Since you like the examples you try to do with an example but not as happy or as illustrative as yours in your gatherings.
You paint a picture with dimensions of 2,806 mm by 1,689 mm. And you frame has made him a carpenter friend of elm wood, when the normal is to use pine. There are no in-store racks this measure, and the canvas is a canvas that you bought in Brazil during the honeymoon. The tubes of oil paint are brand for Rembrandt. Pints \u200b\u200bthree women as its central theme, which are Bacchus wine receiving and two men asking favors of the god, as secondary characters. All included in a landscape with a river, a bridge, two houses, three mountains, four clouds and sky: a normal box with some original aspects about the topic but not the paintings that will mark a milestone. And send it to the international painting competition. The organizer of the contest seems a very original and thought that with that issue and the signature of a famous painter can be considered as a high economic value and decides to transform famous painter to not notice that has been used. The organizer convinces you that your table has been lost, but do not know what you had done a thorough photo story in your table. The organizer believes that with a brush can be turned into a cubist painting to give to sign the famous painter, renowned and dedicated and does. Well, I rolled over as it blurs but retains the original structure. So that you never noticed the fraud and decide to cut the figures transformed with large strokes and change of place: the sticks in different places of the table. Despite the changes, the three women remain the central theme but think that given the substantial change in their faces any picture can be about three women. The god Bacchus and looks more like a dog than a god, and the two men without noses and eyelashes are cut and also transposed to respective corners. The result is that no longer seems, at first glance, the initial picture, but if one examines the figures separately will find that it is plagiarism, fraud and deceit, so he decides to give him some more touches and cut more shapes. After many changes and touches, the organizer is noticing is that plagiarism in some areas of the picture, so I decided to leave it dry and cut across the canvas in squares of one square centimeter and reconstructs the faces of the figures by gluing pieces of faces and hands sticking pieces of hands and clothes sticking pieces of clothing. With the following have three female figures and a landscape, but it bears little resemblance to the original. In addition, Now there are two rivers, not one, two bridges, three houses, four mountains, five clouds and sky, but the sky will not matter because all landscapes have a sky. If done with the original synopsis would not be possible to find similarities between the figures, but the structure of the landscape remains the same, so still a few strokes of the river changes direction, adds two mountains and painted three trees. Despite all these changes makes the same process of cutting into squares to the landscape that goes unnoticed and blend the squares of the mountains and trees squares and cubes of heaven, and with them makes the puzzle but will compose providing a form that no longer really know if it is mountain or plain or what exactly, and you get a mishmash that may seem to many an artistic originality. A simple view is no longer resemble the original, because the squares are randomly placed by only forms of rivers, houses, trees, clouds and decielo. Just in case anyone might suspect that you are using the original box to another in a short time, instead of inventing an original artistic work that would take years to implement it now, so that the dimensions are not the same, "I cut the four corners the wooden frame and trimmed the excess cloth and pulls. And it is no longer square, but octagonal. "With this change will not notice no fraud! "thinks the organizer. Besides all this cut a few pieces of new linen and throws it away. And supplemented with patches of another canvas. These patches are left unpainted. As the result it gives a great artist for submission to the contest and the great artist, devoted writes that in a cloth which serves only to wipe your ass, paint that shit and leaves reflected in the table indicating their droppings all five fingers spite of this, write a caption on the box saying that his agent, who has an English name, everything he touches turns to gold, so I sold the painting for a fortune and, incidentally, laughs at all those who go to see the painting in the exhibition, agent and you, who have been the fool who invented the box and still gives a few strokes here and there and even use your name that was the signature of the table put Luis Herrero, and trimmed with careful, and a painted house includes it in a sign that reads: "The blacksmith's forge Luis, the fool." and crashing to the canvas more stools and writes below: "I am painting with my droppings this story of a collapse."
Dragó If that is what course he will say he can not do a synopsis, do not look at anything, it is not plagiarism, that if you put a picture side by side could not be found to be plagiarized says jurisprudence. But you have been the author and begin to see a strange coincidence that may go unnoticed because any artist can come up painting three women.
Now there are more men. It also checks that the corners of the picture are cut but prolong the cuts are the same dimensions: 2806 mm by 1689, and look at the back and find that a large part of the canvas pieces are from Brazil and that nothing but Brazil are manufactured. And in one hand you see a nail that is equal to what you have painted ... and a leaf of a tree that appears in the crown of one of the three women that strives to make your nerves in a certain way you recognize it as yours. And the button a shirt that sported a character find it next to some weeds in the river. " But I also recognize because remember that painted him five and not four holes, and also acknowledge an eye of a character that looks nothing like the painting for you, but recognize that the brightness is done as you did with six points and two tiny white dots painted yellow for the brightness of the pupil.
So start looking in detail to find out that your picture are great aspects that support this: most of Brazil's linen canvas, size, because if we extend the cuts are exactly the same, and you begin to see scattered throughout Table dozens and dozens of little pieces of your table. The first thing that happens is that you get nervous. Imagine your picture in this battered circumstance is signed by Picasso, and within the same box is your signature but appearing as a sign legend. At least you'll have to send judges to investigate because the use has been contrived so as not to notice but you see your picture harlot with all traces of deceit or Threshold said "The World" on May 8, 1999, prostitute but not "improved." This means that the picture will be "improved" and have to thank the Picasso that you used your picture and he has made a masterpiece and has been "the margin, uncontaminated and free. " And write your buddy threshold that has all the pulpits of the country in which Engola voice to say: Pregnant Luis Herrero of his own fantasy. New flower of holiness, the accuser is pregnant Picasso's intellectually powerful influence of Picasso, and a process of coven has turned to this influence, feeling robbed by the master, which is how it feels every woman after a rape. This metaphor can only be interpreted as insulting to the great master plagiarte well and use your picture, you have been raped and fucked also have to be happy and also you felt robbed by the teacher.
I do not know if you've ever been at dinner the planet, what I can tell you, because what I saw is that in 1993 when the jury retired to deliberate and were doing the pantomime, as if they were there after severe debiberaciones deciding the winning makeup behind some screens to a journalist (I think his name is Molto, Molló or something) that he would go on TV giving the news of the winner. I, for one slot in the screen I saw how he reviewed some records where the text was written, so after half an hour, when they decided the winner, reproduce on TV. I sat stunned at my table again was in the corner next to the screen and when I told the guests, other finalists and their wives, I do not believe it. I said I was playing Mario Vargas Llosa was born in such and such and such, and author of such and such has been the winner of the 1993 Metro etc etc. etc. With the bustle of the moment I do not believe it.
In this, some retired employees a little some lights, rolls of wire, a TV camera was in the same corner of the screen and conditioned makeup. Moments after a juror came to the microphone saying that he was still very tight and that the vote had already been ruled out some of the finalists, so that some poor finalists there was maintained a naive illusion. The journalist, on the makeup table, s Eguía furiously studying the papers on Mario Vargas Llosa. Somebody set the screens so that no one could browse. Diners crossed out in a ballot aliases removed from the pool (so called). After half time and after multiple odds pantomime deliberations juror went on to say that the winner had been "Ahriman" author of "Dionysus and Ariadne," the pseudonym of "Death in the Andes." With thunderous applause, there was a corridor from the entrance to the room with all the cameras and lights by the triumphal entry the winner with the Minister and the owner of the publisher. "The winner ..." boomed the speakers, "Mario Vargas Llosa ... ...". who was not in the dining room but was hidden elsewhere in the hotel until the moment of television. One of those finalists dropped his head and bore no fraud because he had been excited that this was clean, and disappeared.
I stayed there to witness to the end of that shame. After the poses, pictures and other shots, I went on stage and told Mario to come a moment to explain something to the rest of the finalists. I wanted to use television cameras to tell you to see how could he had been paid to that sows. But then they took on wings several bodyguards and rushed away without giving time to television was a witness to our words.
The second prize was given to a Basque Professor of Ethics. Who after the heat of the dinner and liquor dijoque the press conference had been writing all summer novel. And it just hit the streets to demonstrate in favor of a hostage by ETA. I told a certain Andres Aberasturi, who was by my side, how is it that journalists do not report fraud because the competition rules say that the original deadline for ending June 30. To which I replied, laughing Aberasturi the bocacerrada "I do not make any grace, that if I knew it was all a pantomime, silly, that was so and so had to accept it. I told him that there were 400 people writing a novel for years to make the broth a few fat heartless. He looked at me with a look of pity and no longer gave me the palabra.Todo this and much more ... I had not told anyone because I always interpreted as the entrant's anger is almost here, because it has reached a finalist, but is frustrated by not getting the prize. I understood that never ever would have been more than adisposición Award of who the owners of the editorial wish, call it whatever you want, but it is a shame to play well with 400personas who know nothing about it and each year present their work to such a scandalous and cruel prize.
Therefore, your ways and tones in COPE Carmen Formoso, who appears with his name on the "Cruz de San Andrés" like your name on the painting by Picasso, was one of the most infamous villainy I While unable to listen to a baby, since the bastards and did not expect nothing. Get a hug
0 comments:
Post a Comment