Sunday, January 30, 2011

Waxing My Boobies Picyures

GRANDFATHER TIPS PSYCHEDELIC

Escohotado Antonio, author of General History of Drugs and one the men who has studied the issue of illegality, speaks with LOFT on everything that is wrong with the system predicts the future of drugs and share their adventures in the world of inspiration narcotic.
Antonio neckline is a professor of philosophy and social science methodology at the National University of Distance Education in Madrid who wrote three volumes on the general history of drugs. This year, compiling just three works in one volume, 1542 pages. His work has become one of the most used information resource for those interested in the subject of drugs. notched the psychedelic grandfather of Spain, the most knowledgeable of the topic, which tried everything and kept his sanity to tell. A wise for many, a charlatan to others. Even dangerous has been cataloged. And if so, is because their ideas are compelling because they go against many of the positions of policymakers in recent times regarding the regulation of drugs.
At 62 years, notched still using heroin for inspiration and snuff to live. Instead of words and arguments crazy ethereal (as might be expected of a veteran heroin addict) notched using a sophisticated diction and a compelling reason to express criticism of the way it is currently perceived drug problem. His mind is bold, insightful and, above all, prolific. He has written essays with anthropological and philosophical nuances. including Reality and Substance , De physis cops, Majesties crimes and victims, The spirit of comedy , which was awarded the Anagram Test, "Whores and Wives and The question of hemp. LOFT shared with her fresh way of seeing the world.

Is there now a problem with drugs has not previously humanity? Perhaps
of Affluenza because for every psychoactive substance old today may be a thousand. This creates, from a positive standpoint, many more ways to control and direct your feelings and perceptions, and on the other hand, many more alarm. It's like the fear that could create the appearance of free thought in the seventeenth century.

Why give that affluenza?
For patients for chemical synthesis were made parallel to the crusade against drugs. witches, wizards and sorcerers had deposits of ancient ecological knowledge and but were crushed by the eruption of monotheism with universal-Brahmanism, Christianity and Islam, their accumulated knowledge was never destroyed. He remained in libraries and private collections. When the crusade against witches began to subside in the late seventeenth century, virtually all the resources they had sorcerers medicine herbalists became honorable. Pharmacies and what is now known as pharmacies, greatly developed in the mid-seventeenth century. Since then the pharmacological arsenal of humanity began a steady growth, leading to discoveries such as that of MDMA or Ecstasy, by Alexander Shulgin, who know a lot. Shulgin is a genius like his father. They know no one knows what chemicals. They get together and come out with a polvito that you take and the life changes you. Makin 'That's magic ...!

His book stresses how important it is for the spread of drugs, the relationship between religion, magic and medicine. And how in shamanic cultures is where it first begins to distribute the drug. But this distribution was made with a technique and seeking an end, more or less spiritual ecstasy ...
Yes, and ritual frameworks very, very closed. Even people swear not to tell what was what finally gave them, how they were and how they felt. That subject is the famous mystic. It is clear that the mystical sense is lost in the drug culture. Prohibited drugs today are used for games.

Is that part of the problem? No.
that drugs taken for recreational reasons, recreational or knowledge of, say, introspection is a correlation. What happens in the field of drugs is even more basic, is secularism. What is in crisis is dogmatism and religion lightly. Before that there were collections of subjects, and drugs were made according to your goals. But we do not want the "beyond" because we do not want the sky. We agree with this life. We're not saying, like Santa Teresa, "so I hope I die high life not dying", as we want this life, we take drugs to control us better, to be able to work better, to be able to understand and get along with others to enjoy. All this is new, because there is no mythical ritual context reservations required the mystical. In a secular world do not expect much.

Do you think illegal drugs, as used in the West, play a significant cultural role?
For youth are the real rite of passage ceremony maturation, social and individual. For people of 40, 50, 60 years, many of them prisoners of the psychedelic 60's - are a reiteration of customs. But young people are a way to be socially and individually tested. And that occurs throughout the world. In Thailand and Vietnam are rave party at a frequency comparable to that of London or Montreal. And in the capital of the Amazon there are raves, with DJ's, with pills and tourists from all corners of the world.

Does that give something of value to culture is simple decadence?
Decadence is in despotism and dogmatism, because they reduce reality, because they give us an abbreviated world like a real world. In the world of drugs there is no decay. What happens is that among drug users and among car users, or gambling, there is a sector that is addictive in nature. The technology is neutral. All that human ingenuity has discovered is neutral in itself. We who, depending on the person and the occasion, we get to the things of their neutrality and make them good or bad.

What good is the consumption of non-prescription drugs by young people? Deepening
rule to know yourself, which follows the Socratic principle, the principle of ethics. The rite of maturation of advanced Western societies in the early twenty-first century. In practice, if being seen is good or bad taste, if controlled or no control, if their apparent education under a monster hiding authoritarian, resentful or depressed, or if on the contrary, has, as Freud would say this one (ie unconscious) healthy and able to enjoy. Provide drugs to the human condition more control, more ability to meet the challenges of life. When the ban comes, also comes the alibi victim that people say that great lie: "Oh, I did not want but I realize I am now a slave and a poor human wreck. I would steal from my fellow citizens and do not keep my word. "

Do you think that all drugs should be legal? Male
, of \u200b\u200bcourse! It is that drawer. Must be drug prohibition. Legalizing drugs sounds so foolish as to legalize the taste for painting, walking and reading. You can not legalize a human activity that is a civil right immemorial. In my opinion it has become a law to certain goals, just as Prohibition did in the U.S.. After a time, was more counterproductive producente.Digamos we did an experiment with prohibition, and the experiment failed.
In Europe, the war of finished drugs for at least ten years. Anyone virtually no risk, provided it is for their own use, you can get all the drugs he wants and will never touch a station or a police barracks. And there are many more points of sale of illegal drugs if they are sold, as before, in pharmacies and the herbalists. In the days of imperial Rome were 900 shops selling opium, and other substances.
But now in Madrid or New York there are 45,000 to 80,000.

anyway If the people can get, what's negative is the ban?
not have both negative. What it does is create a global phenomenon of civil disobedience and thus recovery of essences citizens. People have realized that the laws are to protect ourselves, but to protect others. Therefore a law like drug prohibition, which aims to defend ourselves, is a usurpation and a nonsense, pure corruption of law. Let's say the ban has had the positive effect of generating civil disobedience, which serves to give us the feeling and the certainty that are not subjects that we are citizens.

What about the argument that the drug makes us irresponsible and dangerous to other citizens?
is a self-fulfilling prophecy of the inquisitor drug. Until the ban, which begins in the United States in the early twentieth century, there was virtually no concept of unwitting victim of drugs. Since the ban which put thousands of doctors and pharmacists to jail who would not bow to executive orders, some people are created live that alibi. Now the drugs give you an alibi for doing nothing at all, to be a shit with your family, your friends and others. You're a phony, you're a dreamer, but who gave you the arguments and the basis for behaving well which has been banned drugs and gave them the slogan of demonic monsters.
"All that human ingenuity has discovered is neutral in itself. We are the ones we took things for their neutrality and make them good or bad. "
There are substances like heroin that the decision once one is willing to do things that without them would not do for the simple need to get them ...
That's not true. Heroin is less addictive than coffee or snuff. 100 or 200 times less addictive. I, for one, took heroin for 35 years, but that, on and off , as the Americans say. Never take more than a couple of days in a row, because it gives me a hangover, of course. And over time I have been falling. Heroin is a substance of a subtle effect is not very noticeable, it should be very sharpened sense to realize what influence you. In first few hours you feel a lot of energy, like a kind of amphetamine, but soft and silky. It's a relief for people angry or irritable. The injection method, which is what gave it its bad reputation, it is archaic. Now taken by cashing the dragon. It is smoked in a silver paper or inhaled. The draculiano subject that was injected Yankee, was actually a disciple of the inquisitor drug, and as the inquisitor drug will have less meaning because such practices do not make sense to prick the veins and spread horrible diseases.

Do you think you are about to fall down the barriers and you have total freedom with respect to these substances?
thing is that this type of cross neck is resolved with a decree that says: "Gentlemen, we were wrong, had the right to think freely, or had the right to practice magic." The Vatican and the Protestant Reformed Churches have not yet said "we have killed 300,000 people at the stake for practicing magic, but everyone knows that magic is a civil right that has it either. The ban follows a rights issue and in some countries very high connotes risk hasatan that of the death penalty. There are 33 countries with death penalties. But in the civilized world, especially in Europe, the ban does not actually exist. Of course, the main drug traffickers in the world are people connected to the police and governments.

you ever had problems with addiction or dependence?
I'm addicted to snuff. What happens is that I am because I want because I do not think that life is worth without my cigarettes. I still think it is absurd to speak of a separate freedom of responsibility. The freedoms are responsibilities we take. By smoking may shorten my life or I generate a very bad future. But do not feel any other drug addiction. For example, heroin, love me, although I understand that it is more difficult to take in moderation and sensibly throughout the social imaginary that surrounds it. As it is assumed that the drug is addictive for excellence, people come into this channel often because it suits them, because they have emotional, social, or psychological professional, and take refuge there as a good excuse to stage their need for help and dependency.

seems quite ironic
that is the least exciting the only one that caused addiction.
When you're lacking energy hauled hit many and very strong, and immediately power up your tone. When you need quiet, das hauled spaced and shallow and reassure you. It is the only drug that has a double effect and also stimulates the intellect. The snuff is the only drug sacred from Alaska to Patagonia.

snuff Do you think that losing the fight?
not ever lose it. It is too powerful, too rewarding for the user. May even be a major rebellion if you insist on chasing. Which agree with modern media like the Internet where people start fulminating airlines in order: "We are 200 million users of snuff. Lufthansa, unless you change its policy in a month against smokers, no travel, American Airlines, if you do not change in two months, no one travels. giving ultimatums. Airlines are economies of scale, suddenly run out 10 million customers a month and wham! "Bankruptcy." Apart from simpler measures such as United States, where there are rules so severe that an airplane landing lights a cigarette and someone else ... you could suddenly get ten minutes to five, 100 million Americans light their cigarettes on airplanes. Every time human beings have agreed to have achieved amazing things. We have cut the head of Louis XVI.
"The reason for taking drugs is to know yourself. They must be taken when he tried to himself, respected and, of course, respect for others. "
A drug so heavily used as marijuana, has negatively affected the culture?
It's funny, because now they have discovered numerous medical and therapeutic utility of marijuana. Even has all sorts of nutrients. It is extraordinary even for the erosion. With it you can make paper better than we have.

What's wrong?
I believe that certain personality type, which is fear itself, the person wearing a mask, a role that is imposed should not take marijuana and experiencing its undress effects because it would break its shell routines. Hemp has the power to reveal the radical difference between appearance and the interior of people, so all people living costume should not take it.

What about the crack?
I have taken crack and find it more exhilarating, more rewarding than cocaine user. It is aimed at an audience with purchasing power is not very high, because it still lacks refinement. It is much cheaper, only cocaine base. No need to have a respect for knowledge scientist. For example, the crack is no more toxic than cocaine. What happens is you who makes crack? The humpback blacks United States. They take teens with less prospects. The world's most dangerous drug, which can get really crazy, they are sold in pharmacies and are the neuroleptics.

What kind of drugs are you excited to come?
The 2CB or African onexus . Another product of the great minds of Shulgin. There is little visionary power, but have a introspective ability and aphrodisiac which I believe is the main candidate for the favor of the XXI century. I hope that more will be doing more active drugs. That is, with less have more effect. And drugs that have the effect of intense but brief. Modern life does not let you get to travel as mescaline, about 20 hours. Now we are interested in drugs that will allow us in an hour or two to resolve the psychological and spiritual knot before connected to drugs like mescaline. I think what they are both the chemical industry is legal and illegal in a frantic search of principles ever purer, more powerful and at the same time shorter-acting, with less organic impregnation of the fabric we have the same effect. For example, all who love snuff, what really love is nicotine. Why produce the high nicotine delivery sought the help of a grill, if we can put it quickly in a machine that vaporizes it and without having to produce tar, without combustion, release nicotine so that we can absorb some .

What drugs have not tried would like to try?
No, all I have drawn I have tried attention.

you felt that drugs alter body chemistry, and that this change is negative?
No. If you go to a religious order and you take a vow of poverty, obedience and chastity have a much stronger chemical change that by taking a mixture of heroin and cocaine. And if you deny yourself and fasting practices in your body create an effect very similar to this or that drug. We are a chemical bag. What happens is that ecstasy is worth say-that you get to the vows of poverty, chastity, obedience and mortification "and unworthy ecstasy, you get taken RC25 or morphine. These things say the ignorant, the fans, the dogmatists.

When you look at the shamanic movement ...
Shamans are the doctors and spiritual directors of simple societies. In complex societies, as we have now, shamanic solutions do not seem to apply. Shamans have known but did not seem worthy of consideration people than any other, no less.

Do you think we should all free access to everything?
Eventually yes. What happens is that each drug should have its place of sale. In my view, will be sold at different points:
The peace and power-heroin and cocaine and dangerous hyper-Belladonna, Datura, in the pharmacy.
The trip, which are in the departments of anthropology, science and arts colleges because they help the creative capacity.
The basics, that is the most commonly used, such as marijuana, is in supermarkets.
In education, what do you think is necessary for our children?
esteem and sense of aesthetics. Realize they are doing a science company to take drugs. They're getting in a field which will output data. Drugs that help them better understand what is the human intellectual and emotional condition.

What will be the key when it releases all, when there is no ban?
Loving yourself. The reason for taking drugs is to meet yourself. They must be taken when he tried to himself, respected and, of course, respect for others. Is that only respects the others who respects himself. Life has some obvious disappointments, apart from having to get older and suffer diseases. Many times we lack horizons, sometimes we suffer pain, sometimes we suffer a lack of energy, an apathy that makes us lazy and we lose opportunities for promotion, a better life. Drugs are there as a generic donor of peace, power and exclusion. We use them well or not will depend of each individual. Also the cars are to move from side to side and there are fools who go and kill five and then kill them ...
"The ban is what we can say: 'Oh, I did not realize but I became a slave and now I am a human wreck. I would steal and do not keep my word. "


Escohotado
Interview by Juan Antonio Rendón

Source: www.escohotado.com

0 comments:

Post a Comment